Hi, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. aug. 22., Cs, 17:22): > > Am Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 06:35:52PM -0700 schrieb Otto Kekäläinen: > > ... > > ACK to everything. > > > However, pushing for wider Salsa CI adoption I think makes sense as a > > goal by itself, and I would be keen to hear what people think is a > > reasonable way to proceed with that? > > ACK. What about configuring Salsa that Salsa CI is switched on by > default? > > Since 2021 I'm discussing with Debian Java team (last mail about this in > my DPL contact[1]) to not hide the "Switch Salsa CI on"-button which > makes it extra hard to get Salsa CI for these packages. Not sure about > other teams but IMHO the better strategy would be to make it extra > hard to switch of Salsa CI.
I wholeheartedly agree with Otto's goals in his first email and wanted to propose the same, just make Salsa CI opt-out instead of opt-in. The default (recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline) should work well for most packages. There is another thread about enabling Salsa CI team-wide involving multiple teams and it did not progress much: https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/170 Enabling CI by default Salsa-wide would finally end those time consuming discussions, too. Cheers, Balint > Kind regards > Andreas. > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2024/06/msg00007.html > > -- > https://fam-tille.de >
