Dirk> I just made a non-maintainer release of info_3.12-1 as Octave now Dirk> needs a version of info that is greater or equal to 3.11. [1]
James> You called it 3.12-1.0 but it should be 3.12-0.1. Also you'll need James> to ensure (-sa to dpkg-buildpackage) that the .orig.tar.gz is James> included in the upload. (It's not in Incoming at the moment so James> dinstall will reject your upload) Oh fsck. Okay, I'm rebuilding as 3.12-0.1 now. To avoid fiddling with epochs, I have deleted the 3.12-1.0 from Incoming after assurring myself that the package had indeed not been installed. Dirk> There were three files outside the debian/ that were patched in Dirk> info-3.9. The patch didn't apply properly, and I didn't investigate Dirk> further. James> Their functionality has been integrated into the upstream source so James> they are obsolete. Good to know. I marked that in the updated changelog file. Thanks for spotting my mistakes. Now I'm left with rebuilding Octave so that it can indeed depend on info (>= 3.12-0.1). Three Octave builds in 24hrs, and having been at work at day ... Cheers, Dirk -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] According to the latest official figures, http://rosebud.ml.org/~edd 43% of all statistics are totally worthless. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
