Yes, your right with klyx/lyx stuff. Michael
-- Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44 Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 12:57 PM > To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: fltk and XForms compliance > > On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking > about a > > switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there. > > I got the impression that KLyX is a forked version, and that the LyX > maintianers are trying to make clean up the code to make it less > dependent > on a particular GUI toolkit. Can someone confirm/deny this? > > On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote: > > Someone should tell them about GTK, now that version 1.0 has been > released. > > GTK is hardly the only free GUI toolkit. Check out > http://www.theoffice.net/guitool for an overview. > > Ray > -- > Obsig: developing a new sig > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
