On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 22:00 +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: > > > Am 23.05.2024 20:16 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz <be...@bzed.de>: > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 11:01 +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > > > Yes, but unironically: experimental is a side branch, unstable is > > a > > > MR, > > > and testing is the main branch. > > > > > > It is entirely valid to be dissatisfied with the turnaround time > > of > > > the > > > existing CI, but what we're seeing here is the creation of a > > parallel > > > structure with as-of-yet unclear scope. > > > > You are wasting a lot of hardware resources we don't have by > > abusing > > experimental as a CI. Don't do that. > > I have a string feeling that it is easier for Debian to set up more > hardware (I'm thinking of the "how should we spend the money we have" > mails) than it is to find more maintainers.
Yes, but I think its a very valid request not to waste buildd time for CIing your packages. And maintaining hardware also needs human resources, its not just done by buying new hardware. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
