On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 23:16 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Andreas Tille (2024-04-10 22:44:25) > > > I do understand the argument that lots of different workflows > > > adds > > > friction. But I'm just still using what used to be _the_ standard > > > one > > > (insofar as we ever had such a thing). Putting everything in > > > salsa/git > > > doesn't standardise workflows in itself. I think Ian/Sean > > > identified 12 > > > different git-based methods in their dgit review. > > > > I agree that different workflows are not helpful. We have DEP14[1] > > ... but we have no efficient processes to > > a) accept DEPs > > b) dedicate to accepted DEPs > > or teach gbp about DEP14. See this git-buildpackage bug from *six* > years ago: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829444
DEP14 is a candidate, I can't see that there was any consensus to accept it. Just because there is a DEP there is no need to implement it without having any consensus on it. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
