On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:35 PM Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi FTP-masters (cc d-devel list),
>
> A package, that I had initially introduced to Debian some months ago and
> had been pending in NEW queue since, was rejected few days ago, like
> this:
>
> Quoting Debian FTP Masters (2024-05-14 12:00:12)
> >
> > An exception was raised while processing the package:
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 121, in
> > wrapper
> > function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
> > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 248, in
> > comment_accept
> > transaction.copy_binary(
> > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 390, in
> > copy_binary
> > self._ensure_extra_source_exists(filename, db_source, archive,
> > extra_archives=extra_archives)
> > File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 214, in
> > _ensure_extra_source_exists
> > raise ArchiveException('{0}: Built-Using refers to package {1} (= {2})
> > not in target archive {3}.'.format(filename, source.source, source.version,
> > archive.archive_name))
> > daklib.archive.ArchiveException:
> > p/pandoc-filter-diagram/pandoc-filter-diagram_0.2.1-1_amd64.deb:
> > Built-Using refers to package rust-ahash (= 0.8.9-2) not in target archive
> > ftp-master.
>
> I it correct to derive from the above, that packages in NEW queue must
> be freshly built, and that I (and we, generally) therefore should
> routinely rebuild packages pending in NEW queue to ensure that they are
> acceptably?
Not a ftp-master, but if you see such a message, it means that your
package has already been accepted, and you can continue uploading
without going through the NEW queue again.
--
Shengjing Zhu
