On 2024-04-18 Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > Let's start with the first category. Those are packages that could be > binNMUed, but there are issues that make those rebuilds not have the > desired effect. This list include packages that > * are BD-Uninstallabe, > * FTBFS but with out ftbfs-tagged RC bug, > * have hard-coded dependencies on pre-t64 libraries, > * have $oldlib | $newlib dependencies (those are at least wrong on > armel/armhf and violate policy 2.2.1 once the pre-t64 libraries are > decrufted), > * have been rebuilt before all dependencies were built, > * have broken symbols/shlibs files producing incorrect dependencies, > * or might just be missing the binNMU (but those should be few).
> hugin [...] Good morning, thanks for the update. Looking at hugin, I think it is fine on all release-architectures, none of the problems noted above apply here. Am I missing something? TIA, cu Andreas PS: fakeroot seems to be an important blocker not in the list.
