Quoting Jonathan Dowland (2024-04-17 11:14:20) > On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 9:21 PM BST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > What I am not open to is abandon the one-git-repo-per-source-package > > packaging style that is commonly practiced in Debian. As I understand > > it, only Haskell and Rust teams use giant-git-for-all-team-packages > > style > > I've never interacted with any Rust packaging. > > For Haskell, I believe there are sound technical reasons for the > monorepo. I have found that trying to contribute fixes to Haskell > packages is difficult because it is so different from Debian convention. > I think that's important, so a decision to use a monorepo should not > be taken lightly.
Interesting: Can you elaborate on those examplary contributions of yours which highlighted a need for maintaining all Haskell packages in same git repo? (or did I misunderstand your point?) Also, for the record (as the above could be misread as such): I do not take such decision lightly. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
