On 11.03.24 00:41, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:48 +0100, Mathias Krause wrote: >> To get rid of the over-alignment, a rebuild with a linker that >> doesn't enforce the overly huge alignment any more is sufficient. >> In Debian terms that would be anything starting with buster. >> >> I, thereby, request to rebuild affected packages. > > So as I understand it: this will be fixed by itself as soon as somebody > uploads or binNMUs the package?
Correct -- as long as the release used to build the package isn't an ancient one, it will resolve the issue. > Then I would wait for some point near the release. And packages that > haven't been touched since buster might need some qa love anyway!? That works for me. The 32-bit time_t transition Jeremy mentioned seems like a good candidate to force a rebuild of a lot of packages. Is there an ETA for it? I found [1] which mentions to do the transition in January but we've March already. Thanks, Mathias [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time