> > I think we should backout egcs and libstdc++2.8 from hamm and go back to > > the old g++. For one, altg++ doesn't even work with it. > > I strongly disagree. g++2.8/egcs + libstdc++2.8 is the first version of the > GNU C++ development environment that comes close to supporting ANSI C++; > previous version lacked or at best had only partial support for modern C++ > constructs like templates, exception handling, standard template library > (see http://egcs.cygnus.com/c++features.html).
Couldn't it be included as a non-standard (extra/optional) c++ compiler? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
