Le mer. 11 oct. 2023 à 14:54, Jonathan Kamens <j...@kamens.us> a écrit : > Can you confirm that this occurred with 4.0 rather than 4.1? I'm a bit messy & forgetful these times. But you have #1053812 against 4.1 already.
> > Can annotations/mypy testing be considered now "best practices" for > > Debian native packages ? > > Best practice? Sure. Requirement? Not so much. Of course it's not a requirement; and it can be done iteratively. > Regarding apt-listchanges in particular, I have already spent countless hours > getting > ready for this new release, including the addition of a substantial unit-test > suite > where there were no tests before. I see it, and it's nice work. > I do not have the bandwidth to add type hints as well, > and I do not think this should be a blocker to releasing the new version to > the public. This is why I propose to do it. > I am happy to consider a MR if someone else wants to add typing to the > code-base. There's a first MR pending. There's another one against python3-debconf with 100% "mypy --strict" coverage. I just don't know how to handle the "py.typed" there: it's a flag file, contents doesn't matter. It could be a "touch" in debian/rules, I just don't know what is the prefered way. Greetings
