On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I did find this here <https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS> after I emailed > the list: > > QUESTION: Can you do all the control-server actions by using fields > in a pseudo header in an email to bugnumber@b.d.o > <mailto:bugnumber@b.d.o> or do you need to use control@b.d.o > <mailto:control@b.d.o>? > > ANSWER: You need to use the explicit control@ mail copy, automatic > parsing isn't done. From what I understood it's worked on but it > might take a bit to make it reliable and not catch something it > shouldn't. This is about plain commands, not about the Control: pseudo-header. This QA transcript is from 2010, the feature was added in 2012.
- Control header sent with done email didn't do what I e... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do... Peter B
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn'... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Control header sent with done email d... Peter B
- Re: Control header sent with done ema... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Control header sent with don... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Control header sent with don... Andrey Rakhmatullin
- Re: Control header sent with done ema... Andrey Rakhmatullin
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn'... Andrey Rakhmatullin
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do... Andrey Rakhmatullin
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn'... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Control header sent with done email d... Don Armstrong
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do... Marvin Renich
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn'... Russ Allbery
- Re: Control header sent with done email d... Marvin Renich
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn'... Jonathan Kamens
- Re: Control header sent with done email d... Andrey Rakhmatullin