El 10/07/23 a las 14:52, Helmut Grohne escribió:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:58:07PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On top of that, a minimal installation chroot doesn't need a
> > fully-featured dhcp client. As Simon said already, busybox is there
> > for any reason for a minimal one. For the rest - installer and whatnot
> > - the installer and tasklets should pull in the required stack as
> > needed.
> 
> I contend that currently a debootstrap includes a dhcp client and this
> is more of a migration from one dhcp implementation to another. Since
> dhcp is the most common way of configuring a network, supporting it in
> ifupdown by default also seems like a reasonable choice.
> 
> > So I think not only we should not bump the priority of dhcpd-base, but
> > we should also change ifupdown's down to optional.

I would like to just echo this:

> 
> I don't quite see consensus on this yet, but I already see significant
> interest in changing the default network configuration method. I hope
> that it is out of question that we'd demote the priority of the
> recommended dhcp client when demoting the priority of ifupdown. Demotion
> of ifupdown needs to come with a proposed replacement and/or with
> changes to the debian-installer. I do hope that we can get that
> discussion going and implemented before trixie. However, this is about
> changing the default dhcp client for use with debootstrap and moving the
> priority from one package to another seems like an incremental
> improvement that is not blocking the bigger goal of changing the default
> network configuration tool in any way.
> 
> I expect that dhcpcd will not be important in trixie, but for now that
> move makes sense to me, because it is as easily reverted as it is
> implemented. This is an instance of "The perfect is the enemy of the
> good."

[snip]

Could we just give a shorter step right now to make things move forward,
and let the discussion about the default network interfaces
configuration tool for later?

Thanks,

 -- S

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to