Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se> writes: > If you want me to take suggestions like coordination seriously then > please consider adressing https://bugs.debian.org/934463 soon or admit > that sysvinit maintenance lacks the resources to do coordinated > transitions. Dropping things and letting people pick them up if they > think they are still useful seems to be the only practical way forward.
I thought the suggestion I'd made as the last comment on that bug (roughly, consider a migration to orphan-sysvinit-scripts after the bookworm release) was not entirely unreasonable? It's not entirely straightforward (and I'm not sure udev rules are best handled thus), but still probably better co-ordinated via that bug report rather than this -devel thread... Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org
