> > In this case, if somebody has the knowledge to build their own 2.1 kernel
> > (since one didn't come on the CD), then they have the knowledge necessary
> > to get packages from "unstable".
>
> It's very unpleasant to have to download things whn you have just bought a
> CD. And many users are forced to use new kernels because of their new
> hardware drivers.
> These package are already a working feature of hamm... why would we remove
> it?
The 2.1 kernel is not part of Hamm and so these packages are _not_ a working
feature of Hamm.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
