On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:11:40PM -0500, nick black wrote: > it's 2023 and imho time to stop supporting unshadowed passwords > from the installer. > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/user-setup/-/merge_requests/5 > > 1) nis (and possibly conserver?) seem the primary drivers of an > unshadowed passwd.=20 > > let me freely admit that, despite the advanced age of forty-two > (seventy-eight in UNIX years), that i know nothing about nis/yp > except that there was a big o'reilly book about it back when one > read the security book with the big safe on the front and the > scripting book with the big drill. i suspect it's basically a > halfway point between syncing /etc/passwd and /etc/hosts with > cron+rsh, and hiring someone on whom you can inflict ldap? so > please correct me wherever i'm woefully ignorant. > > ...but it appears that NIS can be made to work with shadowed > passwords (though without their benefits). this is from a > cursory reading of a FAQ last updated in 2003, so take it with a > grain of salt. the "linux network administrators [sic] guide" > seems to confirm this, and can also help you set up IPX or UUCP. [snip] > i'm absolutely not suggesting we stop supporting NIS or other > programs which rely on unshadowed passwords. it's a big ol' > tent, and we have more than enough room for you to carry forth > the torch of Solaris 2. i just don't think this belongs in the > installer anymore.
I know what NIS/YP is, I know of a couple of places where it is still in use, and, as Mark Haber said, the people running those places know how to find and flip a switch. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
