Hi Nilesh, On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:21 PM Nilesh Patra <nil...@debian.org> wrote: > I started this thread a while back, and decided to simply ask upstream about > what their > opinion is[9] > It looks like the situation still not fully certain on whether to let > singularity make it to stable > or not. > > I'd appreciate if someone on the list could chime in and give an opinion on > if they > consider it do-able or not for upcoming bookworm release. >
Could you list the concerns that you have? + Security support? I see upstream comments that they will disclose the relevant fix/commit for CVE, then it should be enough. I think most packages in Debian rely on the Debian maintainer to backport the fix. + Lacking tests? (as per upstream concerns in the Github issue) Do you plan to enable all the tests? I see you have disabled many tests[1] Or even better, could you run the integration/e2e tests with autopkgtest? For example, you can take a look at the containerd package that I've maintained[2]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/singularity-container/-/blob/debian/3.10.3+ds1-1/debian/rules#L68 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/containerd/-/blob/debian/sid/debian/tests/cri-integration https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/containerd/-/blob/debian/sid/debian/tests/integration -- Shengjing Zhu