On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 23:04 -0700, Debora Velarde Babb wrote: > Initially I attempted to create the package with the new name ibmtss. > There was some discussion on debian-mentors list and the response was > that I should NOT change the name to ibmtss and instructed to instead > use an epoch number.
Personally I would rename the package to ibmtss. Renaming represents one-time migration pain for yourself, the Debian ftp-masters and all of the existing package users, but not renaming represents confusion for every person looking for the new upstream name but not finding it in Debian if we didn't follow the upstream renaming, potentially this could even lead to someone packaging it as ibmtss too. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
