On Oct 14, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote:

> > This is not "the Debian FAQ" but "the DPKG FAQ", which has been known to 
> > recommend awful things in the past.
> But it is still considered in the present times by the dpkg developers.
> Bug 923423 was closed several hours ago based on this dpkg FAQ:
This is obviously convenient on Guillem's part, but we have to optimize 
systems by default for the general case and not just for dpkg -i.

> (the issue here is that there is a fsync for *every* file, so that for
And at this point I am wondering if this is a good design, or if it 
would be better to use a different strategy.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to