Paul Wise left as an exercise for the reader: > > if resolving the resulting bug report is the bar needing clearing to > > enter the archive, that does seem to require FTPmasters to create a > > complete statement of REJECT-worthy problems in each uploaded > > package, which seems like more work than they must currently do. > > The bar for acceptance would be the same as it is now, the proposal > just changes how the issues blocking acceptance are communicated. > Now you get a REJECT mail, under the proposal you get a serious bug.
i understand. i suppose that what i'm saying is it will probably be worthwhile to convey in Mentors etc. documentation that "resolving the bugs filed thus far [regarding the package in NEW] does not imply that no further bugs will be filed." i'm just worried that people will get a bug filed that is not a complete, exhaustive analysis, and think that it's the only thing standing between them and archive glory. perhaps whatever files the bug ought indicate this in the text of the bug itself. -- nick black -=- https://www.nick-black.com to make an apple pie from scratch, you need first invent a universe.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
