Richard Laager <rlaa...@debian.org> writes: > Could we only have "3.0 (quilt)" then, no "3.0 (native)"? Or, put > differently, if you had a "native" package that is using a Debian > revision and we allow that, what difference is left between "3.0 > (native)" and "3.0 (quilt)"?
3.0 (quilt) always has two tarballs, one for the upstream source and one for the Debian packaging. 3.0 (native) has a single source tarball, which I think is the desired goal here. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>