On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 02:48:49PM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote: > should be the correct choice. For a specific example, I just spotted > https://bugs.debian.org/961136 the second time (last time back in May 2020);
yet the bug was never pinged after it was filed. and so as many bugs it
"got lost", despite being there. I wouldn't blame a busy maintainer for that.
I'd rather blame myself for not pinging the bug in >18 month despite caring.
it's ok to ping bugs without an answer (after a sensible amount of time), and
it's ok to ping again and again (again, after sensible time).
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Stop saying that we are all in the same boat.
We’re all in the same storm. But we’re not all in the same boat.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
