> upstream .. issue Paolo, thanks for watching. Doxygen works as expected.
In the past, it accepted group commands without being in a "special comment section". Since version 1.8.16, Doxygen requires a "special comment section". Again, as designed, Doxygen does not see those group commands now. Consequently, Doxygen does not emit any warning. And the resulting documentation might† be broken. Actually, I noticed this initially with libopusfile which had empty documentation in chapter 4 because of that [1]. Consequently, Doxygen has no issue. However, looking at the amount of projects affected, a feature request for Doxygen could be to emit a warning if such an "old" style group command is found. Not sure. † That is the problem: It might be obvious. It might be not so obvious change in the resulting documentation. Even in libopusfile, where it was obvious and reported by two other users over a year span, it took me some time to find the cause. [1] <https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/opusfile/-/merge_requests/34>
