On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:37:55PM +0530, Anuradha Weeraman wrote: > > 2) If you do go ahead with switching to the community distribution, then > > "93u+m" is part of the name, not the version number, so I'd suggest: > > > > 1:1.0.0~beta.1-1 > > It does make sense to differentiate with the 93u+m prefix. Amending the > proposed version below: > > 1:93u+m-1.0.0~beta.1-1
Correction: rushed the last email, I meant to say that I agree that 93u+m is not part of the version per se. I just thought that it would be good to include, just for specificity. However, amending the proposed version as suggested since it makes sense: 1:1.0.0~beta.1-1 thanks Anuradha
