On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 11:53 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 1 May 2021 15:19:43 +0200 > Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > The samba package is held in stable-new by bug#939419, see > > > > https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html > > > > > > Thanks, Julien. > > > > > > Can we fix it with cherry-picking > > > https://salsa.debian.org/samba-team/samba/commit/bedd051122980c31dd1c1431ce9e40ba01dc5990 > > > as 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u2 then? > > > > Rather, I think > > https://debdiffs.raspbian.org/main/s/samba/samba_4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1+rpi1.debdiff > > would be more appropriate, as it is, for me, more appropriate than > > dropping a binary. > > samba package maintainers, how about pushing above change and > before security fixes to proposed-updates?
PIDL should never have remained packaged after openchange was removed https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openchange This was the only consumer (globally, not just in Debian). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett (he/him) https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Team Member (since 2001) https://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
