On 2/6/21 6:10 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I believe a good, fast locate is something that we should have in our base > install; it is fine to keep it out of the cloud image (as today), but it is > genuinely useful for both desktops and servers, and with a low cost. seconded, thanks for writing plocate! > Thoughts? I think plocate should have a Conflicts: mlocate. There is no need to install two locate implementations in parallel, it will just create useless IO. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
- Proposal: plocate as standard for bookworm Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookworm Bernd Zeimetz
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookwo... Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookworm Paul Wise
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookwo... Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bo... Paul Wise
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard fo... Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookworm Josh Triplett
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookwo... Holger Levsen
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookwo... Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bo... Josh Triplett