On 27/12/2020 08:11, Paul Wise wrote:
M. Zhou wrote:I don't quite understand the meaning of automatic upgrades on a rolling system such as Debian/Sid. According to my own experience, such automatic upgrades could be dangerous.I have been automatically upgrading Debian testing 4 times daily using the unattended-upgrades package for many years now, and automatically pulling security upgrades from unstable (#725934). The QA processes that Debian has for testing migration mean that it has mostly been fine, apart from disruptive things like the Python transition, the Firefox XUL to WebExtensions transition, GNOME shell API changes breaking extensions or package removals due to RC bugs etc. Fabrice BAUZAC wrote:I have read somewhere (where?) an advice for testing/unstable users that says to upgrade only when you know you will have some time to deal with an issue, should that occur.I disable upgrades when traveling, this is definitely good advice. M. Zhou wrote:So, do we have a consensus on whether automatic upgrades should be enabled by default?I think Debian stable users should enable automatic upgrades (IIRC that is the case now). Debian unstable/testing users should probably only enable safe upgrades that don't remove packages.
If I can be asked if I want to take part in the usage monitoring thing during the install process, could enabling auto updates be something I can be asked during the install process.
If Debian is about putting this power / choice in the hands of the user by having things enabled by default you are removing that choice.
It also treats users like they are people who have the intelligence to do this, rather than windows which seems more like 'I need to do things for you'
Paul -- Paul Sutton https://personaljournal.ca/paulsutton/ OpenPGP: 4350 91C4 C8FB 681B 23A6 7944 8EA9 1B51 E27E 3D99 Mini Debian Gaming Conference - 19-22 November 2020 https://mdco2.mini.debconf.org/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
