On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:02:41PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> That's not enforced by dak.  The only case it would be enforced is when
> once try to upload the 1: version while the 0: is still published, which is
> rare in the cases of epochs.

right, thanks for making this detail clearer.
 
> IIRC, there *used to* be an actual problem way back in some program that
> couldn't handle the : in filenames, and that's why they are not present to
> this day.  I argue that we could just put that : (or the %-encoded version,
> to avoid accidentally ssh-ing somewhere...) and be done with whatever
> problem.

I very much agree (using the %-encoded version for the sake of some
filesystems).
 

-- 
cheers,
        Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁       holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to