On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 18:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote: > > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources > > has the following versions of src:libreoffice. > > > > Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 > > Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 > > Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 > > > > But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. > > $ rmadison libreoffice --suite buster-backports > libreoffice | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source > libreoffice | 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source, armel > libreoffice | 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 | buster-backports | source, amd64, > arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > explains already one version: the armel one.
A little bit of further digging suggests that someone[TM] should file an RM report for: libreoffice-gtk2 | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x uno-libs3 | 6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x which appear to be cruft. Regards, Adam
