Hi debian-devel,
Summary: Team work for the win On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:16:07PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2020, at 16:10, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > REJECT > > > > #945542 > > > > > > > > === > > > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > > concerns. > > > > > > Bastian, > > I'm curious why do you think a discussion in progress is a good > reason enough to block my work with no actual objections to the > package contents? > > I've waited for this package to pass a review for so long > and all I get is a REJECTED? > The clue '#945542' and "discussion in progress" is most like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945542#94 It has <snippet> On Sat 2019-11-30 12:15:55 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > This problem is already listed since a long time in > https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html. But reading this page, the closest thing i can find is its description of "Package Split", which reads: >>> You split a package too much or in a broken way. Well, broken or too >>> much is a wide definition, so this is a case-by-case thing, but you >>> should really think about a split before you do it. For example it >>> doesn't make any sense to split a 50k arch:all package from a 250k >>> arch:any one. Or splitting a package for only one file, depending on >>> the main package. Yes, big dependency chains can be a reason. Or big >>> documentation split into one -doc package. The point there is big. Bastian, if you meant something else, please correct me here! <snippet> Then eight months past. How can we continue with where the november post is about: rust software to work in a well-established way in Debian ? Regards Geert Stappers DD -- Silence is hard to parse
