On Sat, 02 May 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Personally, I don't see any real benefit of standardizing on (making up an > example here) debian/.build over debian/build.
Same here. The arguments against debian/build are very weak. If we care about a source package building a binary package named "build" or whatever, it's really a unique case and surely it can be built with some overrides and passing a different path where needed. There's also the precedence of debian/source that has taken over a part of the namespace below the debian directory. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
