On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 06:37:50PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 18:04:41 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I think you should > > file the bugs at severity:minor, given the amount of involved packages, > > and the fact that you state we might not be able to remove gtk2 in many > > many years. > > If you say so. I was going to use normal, like I did for the analogous > dbus-glib MBF; the practical difference between minor and normal doesn't > seem significant. > > Given GTK 2's lack of feature development (for things like HiDPI) it > seems higher-severity than "a problem which doesn't affect the package's > usefulness", and it's certainly not "presumably trivial to fix" in > many cases.
I wonder, perhaps it'd be better to use "normal" for packages that _use_ GTK2, and no bug at all for those that provide an input method/theme/etc for GTK2+3? A bug that's not supposed to be actioned upon is no good. And probably an immediate ITR for GTK2-only inputs/themes. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
