Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> 于2020年3月16日周一 上午8:15写道： > > Hi Thomas! > > On 3/16/20 12:31 PM, Thomas Pircher wrote: > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> I would like to suggest to replace vim-tiny with nano as the default > >> minimal > >> editor installed with debootstrap and therefore debian-installer. > > > > Would you consider nvi as an alternative to vim-tiny? It is quite small > > and is functional enough to edit the occasional config file when > > necessary. > > Since nvi [1] does not suffer from the same regular build problems as vim, > I'm perfectly fine with nvi over nano if this should be up for decision. > > My only goal is to avoid the d-i build problems in the future that the > regular build failures of the vim package cause.
At least someone please adopt nvi first... we cannot introduce a package into d-i without a maintainer [2]. Besides, nvi does not have an active upstream. P.S. Anyone know why we did not use the vanilla vi at the very beginning? [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nvi -- Thanks, Boyuan Yang > > A user who does a lot of editing will probably install a better editor > > than {vim-tiny,nvi} anyways. And it would minimise disruption to people > > who expect some form of vi to be installed on the system. > Sure. I just wasn't thinking of nvi when I wrote my mail :). > > Adrian > > > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nvi&suite=sid
