There’s no such thing as rejected in IETF. The timestamp is artificially set to 6 months from the I-D published date. Expired draft could mean many things:
- there was not enough consensus to proceed - draft editors lost interest - draft editors didn’t have time to update the draft in time - or perhaps the document was not suited to be published by IETF The only thing I can say is that the document was not adopted by any working group and that it expired due lack of updates. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> > On 13 Feb 2020, at 11:50, Miriam Ruiz <mir...@debian.org> wrote: > > El mié., 12 feb. 2020 a las 21:07, Nicolas Dandrimont > (<ol...@debian.org>) escribió: >> >> * Ulrike Uhlig <ulr...@debian.org> [2020-02-12 17:46:15 +0100]: >>> I'd like to attract your attention to this very fine document: >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-knodel-terminology-00.html#rfc.section.1.1 >> >> Thanks for the pointer to this document; I hope the authors succeed in >> putting >> it through the RFC process. > > I'm sorry I'm not familiar with the bureaucratic procedures of the > IETF and the RFC process, but I couldn't avoid to see that the text > says "This Internet-Draft will expire on April 25, 2019". > > Does that mean that it was rejected, or is it just a reference > timestamp with no direct relevance in the process? > > Greetings and thanks, > Miry >
