I just noticed that your packaging repo is currently empty. Would you be able to push your current progress to Github so that it's easier to review the source package?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:34 PM Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, do we also use epoch or shall I try the way which Paul suggested > to add epoch only to the binary package? My vote is to use libbpf's new versioning scheme and epoch 1 for both source and binary packages. The primary benefit is simplicity: IMO it's easier to reason about things that way. It looks like upstream is trying to separate their own release schedule from the kernel's. There is now a possibility that some future libbpf release may contain changes not present in the upstream kernel tree at all. In this scenario, it would *only* make sense to use libbpf versioning for the source package, so we might as well get both epoch adjustments out of the way right now instead of raising this question again in the future. Christian
