On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 1:59 AM Carsten Schoenert <c.schoen...@t-online.de> wrote: > > Am 31.10.19 um 16:28 schrieb Aron Xu: > > This could be a reminder that we should start thinking about whether > > we want to keep armel as a release architecture for bullseye. > > No, but some X-based applications might simply get excluded from the > that architecture. There are still a lot armv5 based hardware outside > which is simply working fine with recent Debian releases. I see no real > reason to make all this hardware obsolete simply because some software > which requires some X features isn't build-able on armel. >
I'm not implying to remove it altogether, but it could be moved it to debian-ports, even RPi4 is alreay aarch64 capable. Cheers, Aron -- Regards, Aron Xu
