On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:51:09AM -0400, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> [191009 08:45]: > > If we want to announce something, we announce it. Until we do something like > > this: of course there can be a (temporary) veto. You can't expect us to > > allow > > things that will break the service for everybody without stepping in. > > While that may be fine in general, when a team member speaks officially > (and that was explicitly stated by Bastian in this case: > > > > >> > Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. > > ) on a public Debian list (or privately), it is up to the team to make > each other aware; it is not up to others to use alternate channels to > say "Hey, one of your team said X on devel.d.o". > > If Bastian's veto was not a permanent decision, that was not > communicated at all, and it should have been. I'm glad it has been > clarified now.
At least to me, it was very obvious: the capacity problems of Salsa CI have been described as temporary, thus I assumed the veto is 100% temporary as well. So we understood Bastian differently. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months.
