On 19 September 2019 at 20:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 19 September 2019 at 16:03, Guillem Jover wrote: | | On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 07:15:43 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > So presumably the dependency graph within debian/rules is wrong. Would | | > anybody here know | | > | | > - either a failsafe idiom forcing the right thing to happen | | > - or a more efficient way | | > | | > to ensure the binary-arch is built before binary-all? Should I force it? Is | | > that wasteful? Is there a recommended way? | | | | I've just skimmed over the rules, but I indeed see several problematic | | constructs there: | | | | - «build: build-arch» that should include build-indep too. | | Ok.
Tried, but failed. In 3.6.1-5 I now have modified debian/rules @@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ denmark: ## edd 15 Jan 2004 trying again on build only build: build-arch build-indep ## the main hook is to then have binary depend on both ## binary-arch and binary-indep, and those on their builds -build: build-arch +## edd 19 Sep 2019 for source uploads also build build-indep +build: build-arch build-indep build-arch: make-arch ifeq (,$(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) Fetched the package from pool and r-base-html is still 'empty'. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
