Hello, On Sat 14 Sep 2019 at 01:07PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton > <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> wrote: >>On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote: >>> How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force >>> pushed any time and people pulling from those branches should be >>> expected to handle that? >> >>This would be useful. >> >>I would already assume any branch prefixed with 'wip' might be rebased >>myself, but others might be surprised. > > I would like to have this documented somewhere so that people dont get > surprised. I am not particularly fond of the wip-prefix though and > would appreciate better suggestions. Maybe just go ahead and add it to the salsa wiki page, if no-one objects in this subthread for a few days? rebasing/ wip/ tmp/ work/ > Are we on the same terminology here, myself saying a rebased and > force-pushed branch while you only say rebased? Yes. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
