Becuase the best privacy solution would be to embed DNS resolver into mozilla and they query root servers (which manage by ICANN) to find IPs of TLDs server! I mean the "users’ privacy" is a opaque general definition, rather there are the spectrum of techniques which protect us against mass surveillance. So in some sense there is violation and in other condition it could be protector (ISP don't realize the packet DNS QUERY ONLY). There is a trade of as always :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:28 PM Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> wrote: > > What? How did you manage to go from me suggesting disabling DoH by default to > CloudFlare in Firefox without explicit user consent to an attack on ICANN? > > But I guess that this alternative DNS root nonsense will just never die, so I > should not be really surprised. > > -- > Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> > > > On 12 Sep 2019, at 19:45, Amir H. Firouzian <firouzi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Then you should ask why we have ICANN in the first place! > > > > PS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenNIC > > > >> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I haven’t found any discussion on the topic (although I haven’t searched > >> very hard and only looked for DoH and DNS keywords in the BTS), but since > >> Mozilla plans to enable DoH to CloudFlare by default to US based users: > >> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/09/06/whats-next-in-making-dns-over-https-the-default/ > >> I would rather see an explicit statement. I would be very surprised with > >> Debian’s usual stance regarding the users’ privacy that we would not > >> consider this as a privacy violation, but again I am not Firefox > >> maintainer in Debian and I would rather hear from them than speculate on > >> my own. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ondřej > >> -- > >> Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>
