On Ma, 25 iun 19, 08:08:22, Ansgar wrote:
>
> what do people think about getting rid of current suite names ("stable",
> "testing", "unstable") for most purposes? We already recommend using
> codenames instead as those don't change their meaning when a new release
> happens.AFAIK "unstable" is always symlinked to "sid", so it wouldn't make a difference and also manages expectations ;) "stable", besides significantly changing it's meaning at release may also be actively harmful if one dist-upgrades by mistake[1] with 'stable' in sources.list. While dist-upgrades are significantly smoother the Release Notes still have important items that must be taken care of before/during/after dist-upgrade. Depending on your intention using "testing" may or may not be what you want to have in sources.list even through releases. Users that dist-upgrade early or install the next release while it's still in testing for $reasons (e.g. hardware support, newer software that is not available in backports, etc.) should always use the codename to avoid surprises at release (as per above for "stable). Those who want to stick with "testing" no matter what I believe[2] are actually looking for a rolling distribution so it would probably make sense to rename "testing" to "rolling"[3][4]. [1] because 'apt-get upgrade' doesn't install new packages many users have developed a habit to always run 'apt-get dist-upgrade', e.g. to upgrade their kernel package (in case of ABI change). Users are slowly migrating to 'apt upgrade', but running 'apt-get dist-upgrade' on stable just to get security upgrades will not disappear anytime soon. [2] based on more than 10 years experience on debian-user. [3] or remove the "testing" symlink/name and add the "bob" rolling release that was proposed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00136.html [4] or "roling" to emphasize that it's incomplete :p Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
