On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 00:39 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: [...] > My understanding is that this unusual difference between the .orig > tarball and what's in git is an attempt to "square the circle" between > two colliding design principles: "the .orig tarball should be upstream's > official binary artifact" (in this case Automake `make dist` output, > including generated files like Makefile.in but not non-critical source > files like .gitignore) and "what's in git should match upstream's git > repository" (including .gitignore but > not usually Makefile.in). [...]
Perhaps we should update policy to say that the .orig tarball may (or
even "should") be generated from an upstream release tag where
applicable.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Horngren's Observation:
Among economists, the real world is often a special case.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
