On 13.05.19 18:22, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Holger" == Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> writes: > Holger> - packages using cdbs. cdbs has features dh doesnt have and > Holger> I dont think it's wrong to use cdbs. ( > > Just for my information, what are the big features cdbs has that dh does > not? > i've migrated many of my packages from cdbs to dh, but there's one feature which cdbs sports and which i miss strongly (at least: the last time i checked) in dh (so much, that i haven't converted a couple of packages): building of multiple "flavours". that is: building the same code-base multiple times, with differing configurations. while it is possible to do that with dh, it amounts to either a lot of near-duplicate lines or quite some GNU make trickery, which i'd rather not spread across multiple d/rules fgamsdr IOhannes
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Mo Zhou
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Ben Hutchings
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Steve McIntyre
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Holger Levsen
- Cdbs Features Sam Hartman
- Re: Cdbs Features Sean Whitton
- Re: Cdbs Features duck
- Re: Cdbs Features Wouter Verhelst
- Re: Cdbs Features Marco d'Itri
- Re: Cdbs Features Debian/GNU
- Re: Cdbs Features Mo Zhou
- Re: Cdbs Features Debian/GNU
- Re: Cdbs Features [and 1 more messa... Ian Jackson
- Re: Cdbs Features Tobias Frost
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Alf Gaida
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Bernd Zeimetz
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Sam Hartman
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH Holger Levsen
- Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend D... Sam Hartman
- Bootstrapping debhelper (was: Re: D... Johannes Schauer