On 4/30/19 9:55 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> What I found the most easy way is to just use whatever branching names >> upstream is using, and *never* store them in Salsa. If you need upstream >> repository, you can simply run a ./debian/rules fetch-upstream-remote, >> and most of the time, the only thing you need, is merging a tag. What I >> push to Salsa are upstream tags only, which is enough. > > Why? I strongly disagree: having the upstream tree in the same repo > as packaging is awesome. It lets you mix patches both ways with no effort. > Having the upstream tree at home but not pushing it deprives contributors > who are not you of this comfort.
It's basically useless, since upstream repository is just one command away, with the upstream URL documented in debian/rules. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
