On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:41:02PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > I appreciate your thinking of possible solutions, but my understanding > is that Canonical isn't investing in any more Launchpad work than is > necessary.
This overstates the case a bit. It's true that we don't have a large number of people working on Launchpad in the way that we did pre-2012, but there's still active development going on and we can and do slot in small amounts of unplanned work easily enough. (However, as I said in my previous reply to this thread, I don't believe any Launchpad work is needed in this case.) -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
