Hello, On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 07:31PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> Yes, you are right, when I read it again. What I have been "reading" before > is. > > "Two different packages must not install programs with different > functionality > but with the same filenames if they do not declare that they "Conflict:" with > each other." > > But it doesn't say that.. > > So this means there is no way to provide the upstream executable name without > violating the policy? :( - even when using "Conflict:" wisely. Yes -- the point is to have a single namespace. As David mentioned, you should get in touch with the maintainers of the other package; it's likely you can come to some agreement. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
