On 2018-05-16 01:21:01 +0000, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > It appears to be fixed in experimental, which has 3.0. Presumably > that'll hit unstable when the maintainer feels it's ready. > > It appears the the BTS's version tracking may not have fully > realized what was going on, explaining why it's closed and archived.
It appears that the maintainer closed the bug explicitly when submitting the package to experimental (or is there a bug in the BTS management system?): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790204#78 Shouldn't the bug remain open until it is fixed in unstable? Or is the "sid" tag + version information (now present) sufficient to make the bug remain visible? BTW, I've just tagged it "fixed-in-experimental". -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)