On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 15:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I'm not sure now if this also has been said before, but I'm happy to > repeat it in any case. :) I'd very strongly object to completely moving > those fields out of the source packages, because it means when you get > or have a source package lying around then it's missing important > metadata and it stops being standalone, which would require checking > somewhere online, and you might first need to infer which distro/repo > was this coming from. I'll happily take outdated data than no data any > day, because usually you can use that outdated data to trace your way > to the current one, not so if it's missing.
I believe I understand your point of view, but I still disagree.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
