On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 08:05 -0600, Steve Robbins wrote: > I think the suggestion of randomized spot checking is meant to > replace - not add - to the present system of checking that penalizes > uploads of existing source but new binaries. So human resources > should not be the issue.
Yes, that's exactly what I meant, sorry for not making that clear. > I would imagine that the packages currently being selected are not > arbitrary - they are weighted towards library code. Is that fair to > say? I'd reckon so (because I imagine that SONAME bumps probably account for a largish fraction of binNEW packages). Another big one I know of is the kernel which hits it for each ABI bump (at least). Ian.
