[adding -devel] On ഞായര് 25 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2018 03:01 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Does other ftp masters agree with this assessment of considering the > size of the package as the only criteria to accept or reject a package? > I don't agree with forcing other contributors to do extra, non standard, > hacks instead of following the standards were applicable. > > node-three is the standard way for every node tools including webpack to > find this package. Having to replicate this structure for every > depending package is not acceptable. > > I have not objected to every rejection, where it made sense I have > already embedded some modules (is-svg, unique-slug for example, and > switching to a embed first and package on second dependency approach in > general), but I don't agree with this case.
It seems ftp masters are literally the masters with only a GR powerful enough to over turn their decisions. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881339#55 I do not think this is really in sync with the rest of debian philosophy. I think the following steps would improve the situation. 1. If a single ftp master is in disagreement, there should be a team decision (in previous cases of disagreement also, other team members did not get involved). 2. CTTE should be able to overrule a delegate when there is a conflict just like conflict between two debian developers.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
